Carbon Valuation in UK Policy Appraisal: A Revised Approach Response of Government Economists to Peer Reviewers Comments
ثبت نشده
چکیده
The UK Government recently reviewed its methodology to value greenhouse gas emissions in policy appraisal. The Review implemented a move away from the previous approach, which used estimates of marginal social damage costs (‘the social cost of carbon’) to value changes in emissions, to one in which valuation is based on the marginal abatement costs that will need to be incurred to meet specific emissions reduction targets. This change was also suggested by several peer reviewers of the 2007 Defra paper on the Shadow Price of Carbon (SPC).
منابع مشابه
ارزیابی میزان دقت داوران یکی از مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی زبان در تشخیص اصلاحات مورد نیاز یک مقاله علمی ارسالی؛ سال 1389
Background and Objectives: Final corrections on a manuscript sent for publication in a scientific journal are suggested by reviewers. So this qualifies the paper with the least errors for publication. The present study aimed to assess the Persian language peer reviewers' comments on a manuscript sent to an Iranian Scientific Journal (journal of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences), 2010....
متن کاملPeer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملReview of DEFRA paper: “The Social Cost of Carbon and the Shadow Price of Carbon: what they are, and how to use them in Economic Appraisal in the UK”
This paper sets out my comments on DEFRA's new guidance on how to price greenhouse gas emissions – 'carbon' for short – into economic appraisal in the UK. The DEFRA paper begins by drawing a distinction between the social cost of carbon and the shadow price of carbon for use in government economic appraisal in the UK. While the terminology is confusing, this is an improvement on previous guidan...
متن کاملمعیارهای عینی و دهنی داوران در داوری مقالات چاپ و یا رد شده مجله مدیریت سلامت: سالهای 92-90
Introduction: Peer-review is one of the important pre-publication steps for academic papers. It usually assures the readers about the high-quality reporting of scientific findings. Since objective and subjective criteria used by the reviewers are effective factors on the quality of journal, this study aims to assess these criteria for the accepted and rejected manuscripts of Journal Health Admi...
متن کاملImpact of Policy of Purchasing Wheat on Welfare of Producers and Consumers in Iran
Wheat is one of the most strategic agricultural products, which has always been a significant issue for the government. The main purpose of this study is to review the policy of purchasing wheat on the welfare of producers and customers in Iran. Due to the significance of wheat in consuming model of Iranian families, this product has been permanently under consideration. The government grants a...
متن کامل